The Wikipedia Fallacy

theolster | Technology, Internet Ethics, Open Source, Web Cosmos | Monday, November 6th, 2006

Over the last year or so my internet browsing habits have changed considerably, mostly because of Wikipedia. Before this change started to take place, my starting point when approaching the world wide web was to visit the Google homepage. Google, probably the most used and effective search engine in the world provides listings for virtually every web site on the planet - but she has her dark side too.

I started to become a little dissatisfied with the results that Google was producing. They are now so riddled with adverts and that distraction feels a little force-fed. The results were also becoming more inaccurate, for example the top twenty highest ranked pages for any given search appear to be attributed to the sites who make the most effort to engage in ‘Black Hat Search Engine Optimization’ rather than the sites which most deserve to be ranked based on the search engine’s criteria. That is not to say that because I think these techniques are wrong, that they are not inevitable. The internet is as much about marketing as it is an information resource.

Which leads me on to Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia. Or for me not really an encyclopedia as much as just an information resource. After discussing Wikipedia with a friend of mine studying Medicine, he admitted using the website as the first port of call for the answer to a quick question - whether this related to his course or not. We discussed the pros and cons of the website as a resource, as well as the influence of vandals within the community. Our pros ran along the lines of constant praise based on how great is was to have a one-stop source of concise information dealing with topics as diverse as quantum computing and Richard ‘the hamster’ Hammond’s dragster crash. Our cons basically went along the lines of how little work we can get done once we start clicking on the links from one article to another.

Which leads on to vandalism or rather the mis-documentation of it. I’ve been getting a little frustrated with the number of news reports documenting vandalism on Wikipedia, and not because the vandalism is happening, but because they consider it to be notable news. The traditional encyclopedias may be keen to market the inaccuracies within Wikipedia, but the news websites really seem to have jumped on the bandwagon. I use Wikipedia every day for about a year, and to my knowledge I have updated a dozen Wikipedia entries at the most. These have been mostly because of slightly out-of-date articles or bad grammar or text. Most of the vandalism within Wikipedia has passed me by because these instances get corrected so quickly I don’t notice them.

What the news sites fail to acknowledge is the concept of a community based project, where errors are corrected by the community. With a website like Wikipedia anyone can edit it and everyone who uses it should! If a user finds inaccuracies they should be corrected by the user since there seem to be more genuine users than vandals. What we are actually seeing is visitors finding inaccuracies and publishing them rather than correcting them - thus missing the point. Their hype is a fallacy!
So, if I need to find out about a new piece of software and don’t want to read the commercial hype, my first stop is my friendly free online encyclopedia. I say ‘my’ because it belongs to me, and everyone else who uses and contributes - not the news websites who constantly miss the point. However, as I have seen with google, not every big thing stays big for ever - so I will keep my judgement eye wide open - I just can’t see any problems yet.

Interesting comments…

theolster | Web Cosmos | Tuesday, June 13th, 2006

These are interesting comments that I whole heartedly agree with.  All the more so considering the author is an ex-Beeb employee!

I somehow doubt that Bill Gates is going to be bleeding internally at
this news, and suggesting he would completely distorts the story.
Readers are supposed to be able to trust their media sources to help
them determine what’s really important in the world. Or at least that’s
the BBC’s job, surely? Very disappointing.
From plasicbag.org

Copyright Issues

theolster | Internet Ethics, Music, Web Cosmos | Sunday, January 22nd, 2006

No-one could have failed to notice that, over the last few years, there has been an increased news coverage over recent copyright violations of digital media. In particular I refer to music, film and software. Until recently I have had many conflicting views on this, ranging from outrage, indifference trough to agreement. But honestly, I just don’t know. Anyway, I thought that putting some of my opinions down in pixels might actually help me work out how I feel about all of this.

Napster & Cassette Tapes
So for a little history, from my perspective. I first became aware that I was technically breaking the law when I was about 16 or 17… Yes, I have committed a crime. Without a CD player, and ignoring my Dad’s LPs, all of my music was listened to on my old red Sony Cassette Walkman - and none of it was paid for. I ruthlessly copied my mates CDs, my Dad’s LPs and occasionally borrowed CDs from our local library to copy to tape. At that age who could deny me access to the soundtrack of my life, the Beatles, Eric Clapton, Crowded House, Radiohead, Eels, etc. My next step was not the ownership of a CD player, but instead a computer. So not only did this provide me with the opportunity to buy, and more importantly, play CDs, but it also opened the door to peer-to-peer distribution of music. As I remember Napster was the first network that I used. From here, apart from different technologies, networks and software, the principle remained the same for quite some time. I shared my music and copied that of my peers.

However, with a little guilt, an increased wage, and a little jealousy over my friends huge CD collections, I have spent the last couple of years I have replacing 90% of my pirated music with legitimate CDs. I really don’t consider myself to be righteous for having done so, but I enjoyed doing it for myself. But I ask this question. Was I really hurting anyone when I did copy other people’s music?

At the moment I am listening to my favourite compilation tape (copied to my mp3 player) of all time, it’s got half Dylan songs and half Beatles on it. This is the absolute best, definitely my desert island disc, and I seriously recommend it to anyone (Dylan only listing at the bottom). But get this, I didn’t make it, none of my friends gave it to me. instead my mate’s dad made it for me, and he’s works in the judicial system. By introducing me to Dylan, a previous artist I didn’t know much about, I have spent money on his music.

Sony rootkit
The thing is that I don’t think that the public are the ones to blame for copying music. I truly believe that the industry is at fault, and if there were no copying of music between friends the industry would not be as big as it now is. How can they produce the perfect hardware, and medium to make this possible. When the CD was developed in the late 70’s did they not realise that what was being produced was a medium to store data on that would be read exactly the same way each time. I know that Philips and Sony* developed this and not the record labels, but they chose to embrace it. They didn’t have to accept it. Many (including my Dad who worked in pro-audio for many years, most of it with Sony UK) still believe that LPs are far superior in sound quality. Surely, LPs are not the pinnacle of analogue technology, other analogue developments could have been considered to enable a more compact design?

However, in an increasingly harder industry to get into, this new technology has an advantage. Many friends of mine are musicians, and have started their own labels, recorded and produced their own songs - some of which I’ve played bass on. This effort would not have been possible without computers, CDs and the internet. The opportunity to self-publish has never been easier.

Sony’s recent stupidity (albeit with hindsight) surrounding the development of their rootkit, sounds like a rushed Band-Aid gone wrong. I truly wish for the development of a medium for music and film distribution, which does not allow music or film duplication. The problem that we have though, is that time cannot be undone, whatever is provided as an alternative will be hacked and copied to CD & DVD. Thus, catch 22…

Software Piracy
But, lets not forget software. I used to run pirated versions of Win98, Win2000, and XP. Then briefly switched to Linux, before purchasing and OEM version of XP last year. To be honest, I know I’m not unique in running hacked Microsoft Operating systems, particularly with home built PCs. So what was Bill Gate’s answer to this, bundled software with a new PC. Hmmm. I truly respect this, the price difference for the consumer hasn’t changed much - not that I’ve noticed. An easy opportunity for the user to stay on the right side of the law has been provided here. OK, so there are other types of software, graphics, games, and so on. One solution to the games issue has been solved by the development of the console, much less games are copied by console users compared to PC users (my observation only). The closed hardware and operating system of the console make this possible. As for graphics, I don’t know anyone who owns a legal copy of Photoshop…

Maybe, some of the techniques employed by console manufacturers could be employed in music and film distribution…? The responsibility lies with the industry to sort this out.

Free and Open Source Software
Just a couple of notes here on free/open source ideology. I have tried Linux and find it a very incompatible operating system with Windows. I even used Open Office for a year, with appalling results. There just doesn’t seem to be the standard compliance between these products and the Microsoft franchise to enable me to switch permanently. However, despite buying both Win XP and MS Office, I expect the Linux platform and software to develop significantly over the next ten years to enable me to switch back permanently (I hope).

I have also tried to find free music worth listening to, and except for the band ‘Harvey Danger’ have found nothing. I don’t even like their album that much anyway!

Exactly how has this mass theft impacted the industry?
So back to the record industry. Has pirated music damaged their profits? I suspect not, in the same way that sharing music by cassette tape encouraged me to listen to other artists, I think that peer-to-peer has done the same.

Despite the wide publicity and nature of this discussion, I have found it difficult to find balanced, unbiased figures on this. Instead I include a conclusion from the New Scientist magazine dating from March 2004 - Sorry!

Rather than suing the hell out of anyone they can for downloading music, as in the Patricia Santangelo case. The music industry needs to carefully plan their future, where can we go from here. The can forget about the next 10 years because CDs and DVDs will not disappear in that time. Instead they need to consider the technology of 15 years time and start planning.

So who are the victims…

The few instances of wrongful prosecution like Patricia Santangelo

You & me - we need to be able to share music on a limited scale, that’s how we discover new bands. It is in the interests of the record companies to allow this, radio is so shit these days that it is not a solution. Only like minded friends can help us in this respect.

Record companies - They have hurt themselves badly. Very few people have any respect for them, they have forgotten their consumers and instead manufacture bands to keep teenage girls happy (for 5 minutes, when they must start all over again).

Sony - The rootkit, has turned into a consumer nightmare. For a company who used to be at the cutting edge of technology the last few years have been bad. I thus episode signifies the bottom of the trough and that much improvement is made!

To summarise, my new-found respect for the law may have encouraged me to step back to the other side of the line. But the future is in the hands of the industry. I expect the artists to be paid for their work so that I can continue to enjoy it. It’s the record company’s duty to secure their artists and their own future. Half arsed measures (suing and rootkits) are not the solution, they must accept their mistake, learn, and move on.

[* Sony did not merge with BMG until 2004]

The Bob Dylan Tape:
1. When The Ship Comes In
2. Bob Dylan’s Dream
3. Love Minus Zero/No Limit
4. It Takes a Lot to Laugh, It Takes a Train to Cry
5. I Want You
6. John Wesley Harding
7. Forever Young
8. Simple Twist Of Fate
9. One More Cup of Coffee
10. Precious Angel
11. Dark Eyes
12. Bob Dylan’s 115th Dream

Update: The BEEB have been interviewing some UK record industry people about many of the issues discussed above, this can be found on the bbc.co.uk website and on boing boing.

Super Bock beer is quite strong

theolster | Web Cosmos | Friday, July 15th, 2005

I have come out into the peace and quiet of the garden, I need a beer and I have been sat in front of a computer screen for too long now, and I need a beer (did I mention that twice?!) Am blogging on my HP Jornada 680 - so I can’t really say I’ve got away from the computer. Anyway…

A lot has been going on for the past couple of weeks, London bombings, band practices, shopping around for a cheap & decent gym (I have 3 stone to shed - it’s quiet embarrassing really), oh and lots of work! My wife and I have been discussing the pros & cons of blogging - although as total beginners it is pretty hard to discuss in great depth. Maybe more on this in the future?

There are two really cool things that I have come across during today’s ramblings as a broadband user! Firstly, check out Channel 4’s large array of independent short films for viewing. These are FREE! So go here now. I particularly like A Sense Of History, Floating, & Blow. The first is my favourite, very funny and quite dark. Very well written in any case. The second was very emotional, the story of a war being waged by a man, against himself. But the third nearly made me cry, the acting by the two girls as they made their ‘discovery’ is phenomenal. The second cool discovery of mine needs no explanation really. Yeti Sports, waste tonnes of time! playing these slightly cooler games!

Powered by WordPress | Theme by Roy Tanck